|
Post by Jet on Oct 16, 2008 6:51:42 GMT -5
Sinister is weak to optic blasts in general, Cyclops happens to have the most powerfull one. And yeah, he still have it (and even if not- give it to him)
|
|
|
Post by WildKnight on Oct 16, 2008 7:03:00 GMT -5
Sinister isn't weak to optic blasts in general. He's vulnerable to the powers of the Summers family, be they optic or not.
Other blasts (projected from the eyes or not) are as ineffective against him as anything else.
|
|
|
Post by Stark on Oct 16, 2008 8:50:57 GMT -5
Amusing... so Sinister could have a sort of Special Weakness (-2; Receives x2 damage from the powers of members of the Summers family), lol. Which would become x3 if the attack is already x2.
Or something like that. Also, come to think of it, I think I'd make his Healing Factor an Accelerated one.
|
|
|
Post by WildKnight on Oct 16, 2008 8:53:35 GMT -5
Actually, Sinister not only takes more damage from those attacks (he used to take no damage at all from any OTHER attack... but thats changed since), he also loses his Healing Factor against them, and if Scott had the guts to do the deed, he wouldn't reconstitute if killed that way.
|
|
|
Post by Stark on Oct 16, 2008 9:04:39 GMT -5
Whoa... that's one hell of a weakness. Ok... thanks. I didn't know that Cyclops was so fearsome to Sinister.
|
|
|
Post by WildKnight on Oct 16, 2008 9:17:48 GMT -5
Ever wonder why Sinister has such a hard on to make Scott feel worthless and weak?
|
|
|
Post by Stark on Oct 16, 2008 9:28:12 GMT -5
Well, considering that he was such an expert in genetics, I thought he had merely found something he couldn't understand in the Summers' DNA that obsessed him.
Now I know it's much more than that... the Summers are technically the only ones who could bring Sinister to an end, he knows that, and that's why he hates them in particular. Got it.
|
|
|
Post by Cernunnos on Oct 16, 2008 22:44:22 GMT -5
Go for a shoker... go for Xavier! Hell... what about Onslaught? Stryfe?
|
|
|
Post by Stark on Oct 16, 2008 23:44:04 GMT -5
Shoker? Or Shocker? If the first, I don't know him... If it's the latter... no way. I like Xavier as he usually is, as leader of the X-Men, so he is not to be considered. Onslaught craves destruction above everything else, even against mutants, and is the bad side of two of Apocalypse's greatest foes, so I'd rather not. Stryfe, however... now that's interesting. I know he's a clone of Cable. How much do their capabilities vary?
|
|
|
Post by toast on Oct 16, 2008 23:57:06 GMT -5
Stryfe doesn't have the Techno-Virus.
|
|
|
Post by Stark on Oct 16, 2008 23:59:06 GMT -5
And otherwise than that, they would be more or less identical, huh? Of course, he could be changed a bit as Apocalypse could have enhanced him a bit as he made him his Horseman. This settles it. Stryfe will be Apocalypse's fourth Horseman. Thanks for the help, Cern and toast.
|
|
|
Post by WildKnight on Oct 17, 2008 6:05:53 GMT -5
D'oh! I was too late to jump on the winning bandwagon!
I do think Stryfe is an excellent choice though. In fact it may be that someone had already planned to use Stryfe as a Horseman in an X-Men game he may or may not be running...
|
|
|
Post by Cernunnos on Oct 17, 2008 15:53:24 GMT -5
I do think Stryfe is an excellent choice though. In fact it may be that someone had already planned to use Stryfe as a Horseman in an X-Men game he may or may not be running... Your thinking of my M:WW game! I revealed he was brought back in SS#2. And otherwise than that, they would be more or less identical, huh? Here’s his info: marvel.wikia.com/wiki/Stryfe_%28Earth-4935%29I have the X-Cutioner storyline where he was introduced. He singlehandedly defeated all of the X-Men, and whooped Apocalypse’s a$$. Of course Apocalypse was regaining his strength because he defeated Beast, Archangel, Ice Man, Colossus, Quicksilver and some other X-Jabroni… in under 60 seconds! Stryfe ripped him from his rejuvenation chamber and preceded to trounce him.
|
|
|
Post by Stark on Oct 17, 2008 20:56:44 GMT -5
Once again, thanks Cern. A lot of useful info in there.
|
|
|
Post by Cernunnos on Oct 17, 2008 22:46:12 GMT -5
Once again, thanks Cern. A lot of useful info in there. NP man! Trying to help.
|
|