|
Post by VirgoDragon2288 on Oct 28, 2010 6:54:47 GMT -5
I was talking to my friend about how life would end up after a nuclear war and where would probably be bombed, when my friend mentioned Africa. Now I can't get the question of who would nuke Africa out of my head. I mean, it's not a major military power of anything. Would it just float by, mostly untouched? Maybe I should move there...
|
|
|
Post by WildKnight on Oct 28, 2010 7:37:21 GMT -5
I was talking to my friend about how life would end up after a nuclear war and where would probably be bombed, when my friend mentioned Africa. Now I can't get the question of who would nuke Africa out of my head. I mean, it's not a major military power of anything. Would it just float by, mostly untouched? Maybe I should move there... First of all, nobody is nuking anybody. The only real chance for a nuclear attack in the world is if terrorists or somebody equally desperate gets a hold of a nuke, and this not being the 60's, thats not going to immediately set off a worldwide nuclear response. But if for some odd reason, everybody fired the nukes they've got pointed somewhere, Africa would definitely be on the chopping block. Part of the reason Africa is so backward is because almost every nation has an interest in keeping it that way. Billions in resources are there. So yes, it would get nuked along with everyone else. If you're really worried about nuclear exchange, your best bet is probably somewhere in the Icelandic region. Not much there worth nuking, and those countries don't have a lot of really serious enemies.
|
|
|
Post by takewithfood on Oct 28, 2010 8:25:19 GMT -5
I could see someone wanting to hit Egypt or Sudan, but that's about it. (EDIT: maybe Libya.) Then there's South Africa, I guess.
People are pretty horrible, so I wouldn't put anything past us.
~TWF
|
|
|
Post by WildKnight on Oct 28, 2010 9:03:07 GMT -5
Yes we are. Heck, I'd nuke Africa just because a lot of the resources that the next generation would need to start over are there, and I'd want to make sure everybody was thoroughly screwed.
But then I'm loving like that.
|
|
|
Post by VirgoDragon2288 on Oct 28, 2010 15:15:12 GMT -5
Ah... see, we were more on the "Annihilating Terrorist" and "World War 3" train of thought. Not the "I want to blow up the world for lulz" type. Which it would probably turn into anyways. And I now that if I wanted to survive WW3 to go somewhere with as little military might, resources, or population as possible. Somewhere similar to Papua New Guinea maybe.
|
|
|
Post by Dullahan on Oct 28, 2010 15:17:12 GMT -5
I'd probably go to the Arctic. No one cares about the Arctic.
|
|
|
Post by Ushima911 on Oct 28, 2010 15:20:50 GMT -5
Screw it all...lets go to the moon. . .
|
|
|
Post by Dullahan on Oct 28, 2010 15:24:32 GMT -5
Meh, I'd rather hang out in the Arctic than on the Moon.
The Arctic has Polar Bears.
|
|
|
Post by Ushima911 on Oct 28, 2010 15:33:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by WildKnight on Oct 28, 2010 16:23:15 GMT -5
Bears with AK-47's and motorcycles, apparently...
|
|
|
Post by Ushima911 on Oct 28, 2010 16:24:21 GMT -5
HE WATCHED IT!
...and yes...aks and motorcycles..
|
|
|
Post by WildKnight on Oct 28, 2010 16:28:36 GMT -5
Of course I watched it. I was bored (and I love sketch comedy). WKUK isn't my favorite (I think Kids in the Hall owns that distinction), but its watchable.
|
|
|
Post by Ushima911 on Oct 28, 2010 16:38:38 GMT -5
agreed my wild friend
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2010 19:15:24 GMT -5
my friend mentioned Africa. Now I can't get the question of who would nuke Africa Friends with allot of red necks are you? This guy sounds like he crame straight from the trailer park. I would say that we are the most likely to be hit by a nuke. We've had a tough time with extremist in the past.
|
|
|
Post by WildKnight on Oct 28, 2010 20:10:28 GMT -5
Far be it from me to say you shouldn't act like dick, F-Bomb. I've been known to be a bit "opinionated" myself. But could ya try to make sense, at least? Maybe sober up before you post?
|
|