|
Post by Dominus on Oct 14, 2011 17:10:35 GMT -5
Here is a hypothetical situation:
Hero A attacks Villain X with a 5 stones armor penetrating attack. Villain X has a 1 stone force field up and 3 toughness for a total of 5 stones of defense.
Question:
Does Hero A's attack remain armor penetrating after meeting the 2 stone force field which ignores armor penetrating? If it does remain armor penetrating does that mean the remaining 3 stones of attack ignore Villain X's toughness? And if so doesn't does this mean the 3 stones of remaining attack do nothing as they cannot penetrate the 3 stones of toughness? Or perhaps do you apply the toughness first which would be ignored by the armor piercing and then apply the force field which would not?
PS: I think I have answered my own question, but I would still like to hear what you think.
|
|
|
Post by Brainstem on Oct 14, 2011 19:15:34 GMT -5
Two stones are ignored because of AP and 3 get through.
|
|
|
Post by kito on Oct 14, 2011 19:59:55 GMT -5
Agreeed.
|
|
|
Post by malice on Oct 14, 2011 21:02:30 GMT -5
I tend to do it in layers. You'll hit the forcefield first, then get around any reflexive dodge, then through any armor, and finally you'll hit the toughness. If the AP is nullified in the first layer it's not what's gonna make it through the next ones.
Really though, if your attack made it through the first three layers I imagine it's worth it to let you ignore the last one.
|
|
|
Post by Gryphynx on Oct 15, 2011 1:24:00 GMT -5
Forcefield ignores, not negates, armour penetration. 3 damage
|
|
|
Post by comicfan on Oct 15, 2011 13:52:00 GMT -5
What Gryphynx said. Forcefield doesn't ignore armor penetration for the whole attack, but for the stones Forcefield provides. Villain X takes 3 damage.
|
|