|
Post by Cernunnos on Oct 27, 2008 18:41:16 GMT -5
You know, I think I know who might be Mafia... and even so, I think I know who might make this game easier. Unlynch NigromanteLynch Cernunno Just to keep it simple, you see. Reasoning: It's one th ing to be throwing around the suspicions and all, Im game for that because that adds air to the game. But changing your vote to 'keep it even' ? Uh uh, th ats just screwing with the game now... He's got till Thursday to get on and argue about if hes Mafia or not and even then we're mostly just shooting in the dark. I th ink voting of Cer might be a better bet to get a Mafia member as well as expedite further voting. Besides, he'll still be in the dead person thread to throw around supicion to maintain the feel of this setting. Meh... we'll see. I just don't like killing someone who has yet to get on. Especially someone who's name I blurted out as the first post on a thread! I promise... this is the last time I'm changing my vote... today (in game time)!
|
|
|
Post by Presto on Oct 27, 2008 18:47:03 GMT -5
Still, that seems disruptive... and like WK said, makes it more likely NOONE will be lynched at the end of the 'day', leaving the Mafia open to make their hit.
Now granted, I offered the idea of letting the hit go through without reprisal.... But Thu made a good point about the odds, and I think it may be worth more to get one person out of the way and chance hitting a mafia member while chancing taking someone out. At this moment, Odds are practically 50/50.
If we eliminated Nigromante, it wouldnt be because we actually suspected anything, but because this had to be a shot in the dark... If he doesn't get on before Thursday to defend himself, then that makes for a good first character to take out.
However, perhaps voting for someone not present isn't fair.... So thats fine. However, you have been present and very active in sewing suspicion. This vote change however seems to cause problems among the Townspeople, and will limit our abilities to act against any possible Mafiaso. Therefore, if we're going to take a chance, why not go with someone who might be highly suspect?
I present to everyone, that Cer should be the first target. Review the past statements and consider, who among those who have been active so far, prove the most suspicious? (Although the entire [the silent ones are the most suspicious] does hold sway as well).
|
|
|
Post by Presto on Oct 27, 2008 18:51:47 GMT -5
Also note... If we play a second game after this one. We should call the killing group.... The Skrulls.
|
|
|
Post by Dullahan on Oct 27, 2008 18:57:44 GMT -5
Alright, if we can't convince people to take down Cernun then it will be Nigromante, but we have till thursday, don't we? If so, there's no real hurry.
|
|
|
Post by Presto on Oct 27, 2008 19:06:55 GMT -5
No... I don't think i'll accept that.
I honestly feel Cern may be the one to vote for in this interval. We don't have much to go on in this day, but Cern has displayed alot more suspicious behavior than Nigromante.
Or are you defending him because you too are Mafiosa trying to protect one of your own?
|
|
|
Post by Dullahan on Oct 27, 2008 19:10:32 GMT -5
No, but did it ever occur to you that cern might be acting suspicious to try to protect himself, thinking we're acting under the don't trust the quiet ones strategy
|
|
|
Post by Presto on Oct 27, 2008 19:14:34 GMT -5
"The evidence of abscence doesn't prove the abscence of evidence" eh?
It's possible, but at this moment we're shooting in the dark... and Cern offers a more possible and realistic target than Nigromante does. As the game goes on we can turn our attention to the quieter players, but for now Id rather aim for someone who shows more evidence than "Won't say anything one way or the other".
|
|
|
Post by Dullahan on Oct 27, 2008 19:22:37 GMT -5
Maybe, and I've already changed my vote, so I see your point. But my point is we may have to change back to Nigromante if no one else sees it our way.
|
|
|
Post by Presto on Oct 27, 2008 19:30:41 GMT -5
No, I believe the votes should be changed to Cern. Course, we still have two days to make points and change them....
Course, Thursday I might not make it on till late.
|
|
|
Post by Dullahan on Oct 27, 2008 19:32:05 GMT -5
I agree, but how do we change their minds? Well, if we all change our votes to Cern(all those that have declared) then we should have enough to take him down.
|
|
|
Post by Presto on Oct 27, 2008 19:38:28 GMT -5
Unless of course hes in the Mafia as well as them, in which case they may not change their votes to avoid eliminating one of their own... And since we have nothing to go on for either Nigromante OR Cern, it doesn't make sense why they should cling to Nigromante as a possibility unless they are in the same Mafia group and are seeking to either eliminate a townsperson or tie up the lynch vote to protect their own.
|
|
|
Post by Dullahan on Oct 27, 2008 19:41:46 GMT -5
Very true, in which case we are so dead, because as the most vocal they can mess with everyone's votes and cause them to vote for who they want. Or, it could be a smoke screen by the mafia and Nigromante is one of them, and they just don't want us to think so.
|
|
|
Post by Presto on Oct 27, 2008 19:47:21 GMT -5
True, but as its the first day theres too little to go on to really finger someone as Mafia because of silence so far.
Cerns vote change however is quite a supicious action though. So, since we have no other clues, in biting into this one and holding on till either he can provide a compelling arguement or a better piece of evidence comes through.
And sudden silence from very vocal people could be telling.
|
|
|
Post by Dullahan on Oct 27, 2008 19:49:14 GMT -5
True, it is weird not to have heard from WildKnight in awhile, he usually doesn't stop once he starts, but they could have just logged off.
|
|
|
Post by Cernunnos on Oct 27, 2008 19:50:12 GMT -5
You know… I find it very funny how RIGHT after I claim to know some Mafia personnel… both Presto and hero2490 BOTH vote to lynch me.
|
|